I
don't know that these texts by Rachel Blau DuPlessis are "artful."
A professor says in graduate school.
"For the Etruscans." The Pink Guitar The only texts that have moved me from all the readings for the class. A lack of engagement. Nothing he can say about these essays. Maybe I should let one of you lead discussion on these texts. poetry money, writing money, a male bastion of winnings/earnings. I hear a female poet talking about inequities in grants for artists when she arrives at our campus. On a recent questionnaire that crossed my desk, "What does it take to get ahead at this university" pause. is this a rhetorical question? A woman in my life says she's happy to give the men she knows the upper division courses...they need time to write, she says. She'll take the introductory writing courses. She's good at all that grading. Feels like she's giving to two groups, students and colleagues. Collegiality, she calls it. GASP. Sexy pens, evidently, require more time. Who knew? "I don't know that this text is "artful." Careful. "Responsible." long ago on that Rachel Blau DuPlessis visit...she says, I need some recommendations on reading, for the airplane ride back...sees that I'm lugging around Sedgwick's Tendencies, says she has met a local author whose book she is curious about...so should she read his book or Tendencies. I don't know that his book is artful, I want to say. He betrays you. Instead, I recommend Tendencies. Leave it alone. My own ways of making sense of genre start with migrations Migrations away from the voices from presumably elite academic definitions of "artful" Migrations into satisfaction and an emerging self-identification as writer Migrations
into solitary locations,
Migrations
towards queer
Embracing
a larger community. Hoping to collaborate on new literacies.
Acknowledge our inner queer children. Join the self-help study...led
this week by guru Eve.
|
Carole
Maso:
The future is all the people who've ever been kept out, singing. In the future everything will be allowed. So the future is for you, too. Not to worry. But not only for you. For you, but not only for you. Not to discard the canon, but to enlarge it. No more monoliths. No more Mick Jaggers. No more O.J. Simpsons. No more James Joyces. No more heroes. Everything threatens you. Hacks, hackers, slacks, slackers, cybergirls with their cybercurls and wiles, poets of every sort. Rock bands with girls. 170 Wish list: that the homogeneity end. That the mainstream come to acknowledge, for starters, the thousand refracted, disparate beauties out there. 170. The future is for women, for real this time. I'm sorry, but it's time you got used to it. 172 Dream: that this new tolerance might set a tone, give an example. This openness in acceptance of texts, of forms, this freedom, this embrace will serve a as models for how to live. Will be the model for a new world order--in my dream. A way to live together better--in my dream. 175 Wish: that writing again, through its audacity, generosity, possibility, irreverence, wildness, teach us how to better live. 176. |
|
literacies
activations sharing allusions Migrations away from "artful" as narrowly defined by the activations, the data collection/assemblage, and migrations to collective data collection. Educations, sometimes, are about getting the allusions. Late coffee and oranges in a sunny chair. A certain slant of light. Or a broader literacy. To what degree does one have the right to activate that which does not get played out in the dominant imaginary? To reimagine outside dominance and submission paradigms of hetero male privilege? To be able to escape the routine representations of men and women that the TV, the dominant movies, the heterosexual porn industry would have us imagine. To imagine, instead, outside these limited frames, frames that often shape women as the targets of rape, of violence, particularly in the het porn industry. (Cornell works these ideas over in so many spaces...the imaginary domain) Can
we activate to our hearts' content? Or do limited representations
of what is "artful" still impose? My professor expected our silence.
Our denials. Admission to his club. I seethe, still at my silence.
That I didn't respond to a professor who could not get DuPlessis.
She was so far outside what he activates, and therefore, presumed to be
lacking in art. Cannot be taken up. No shots exchanged.
|
To
incorporate the ache of Vietnam, the mistake of it, incapable of being
erased or changed To invent forms that might let that wound stand.
179.
Adrienne
Rich: "Poetry means refusing the choice to kill or die."
|
|
Woolf's
Three
Guineas written by an "angry" woman. Dismissed. How could she
think that education traditions led to war. Silly girl. And an angry
girl. As if anger is a critique. As if women's anger is especially
troublesome. yes, but is she artful?
Her argument was that in learning, in the education system, we trained people to fight. Competition in learning. Crazy systems of education shape our proclivity to war. So what role does genre/gender play in education? How might we rearticulate, revisit ecriture feminine? Is it possible to create a sense of vulnerability I want to associate with queer, with shame, with what I think works conceptually for me as a locus of transformation. A concept that doesn't designate us to "let it be, let it be" locations, and doesn't blind us to our collusions. I cannot endure this concept of war. The
gulf war. the first time I heard the word war---really heard it as
an adult.
Who can we be if we don't understand how disruptions of relation set about feelings of betrayal, of narrative stopped. Mournings so profound that we don't even really know where to start. What to say. How to shape our outrage and our sorrow. To be angry. To desire fusion, to recognize the shame of disrupted interest. To act. But how to speak. And how to respond to silence, or dismissive charges. How to articulate our depressions in the midst of cultural forces on our sexuate beings. How does this war/queer location/silence in response shape our writing? and what might writing look like right now, in the midst of crises, and in the future. In some distant time of peace? How
might
be rearticulated to shape a writing that will hold us. Gather us. Allow us the desire to imagine. Rekindle hope? how long? I fear, more than anything, that depression will over take the voices that give me space. The voices who artfully speak to my reality, to my issues. Who activate enough of my world view that I fantasize momentary fusions...transferences, the kind that are highly erotic, highly suggestive, and which send me to new locations of insight/action. Eve Sedgwick: I dread every
bad thing
I may
stop knowing
|
Let
the genres blur if they will. Let the genres redefine themselves.
185
Wish: that forms other than those you've invented or sanctioned through your thousands of years of privilege might arise and be celebrated. 186 words are the ginger candies my dying friends have sucked on. Or the salve of water. 187. Words
are the crow's feet embedded in the skin of the father I love. Words
are like that to me, still. 188
|